Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Woodahl
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1971No. 12096PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMO OPINION
2Per curiam
Petitioner seeks what he terms a “Default in Judgment” but actually wants a writ to release a detainer filed against him. Petitioner is confined in the Utah State Prison at Draper, Utah, and was previously confined in the Montana State Prison, from which prison he was paroled. As a condition of that parole he waived extradition in the event of parole violation.
This proceeding stems from a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner in the United States District Court in Salt Lake City, Utah, and now pending.
Petitioner complains that his waiver of extradition as a condition of parole…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Moses v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In re CasementoPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Ex Parte JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- State v. MaglioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- People v. Corder, New York County Courts1986
- Goode v. NoblesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.