Dallas Joint-Stock Land Bank of Dallas v. Wise
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after ■ stating the case as aboye).
Appellant insists it appeared it was lawfully in possession of the 430 acres of land, holding same as mortgagee to secure indebtedness of L. C. Penwell to it, and therefore was within a rule stated as follows in 19 R. C. L. 330: “A mortgagee in possession, in the sense of that term as technically used, cannot be ousted by the mortgagor, or one claiming under him, by action or otherwise prior to the satisfaction of the mortgage, this being true even in jurisdictions wherein the mortgagee could not maintain a possessory action for property.” And…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barson v. . MulliganNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Hill v. PrestonTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Calhoun v. LumpkinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Majors v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Betts v. BettsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rainwater v. McGrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Taylor v. San Antonio Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1971