Betts v. Betts

WILSON, ’ O. J.

(after stating the facts as above). Two contentions are presented by the assignments; the firsf being that the trial court erred when he overruled appellant’s exception to the part of appellees’ answer setting up that they had leased the land of appellant, and the second being that said court erred when he overruled appellant’s motion to strike out all the testimony admitted in support of said part of said answer.

The ground of the exception was that it appeared from the allegations in the answer that the lease contract therein set up was within the provision of the statute of…