Clark v. State

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

It is agreed that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, but contended that the judgment should be reversed because of the refusal of the court to sustain the motion to quash the indictment. The part of the indictment attacked is that in which it is averred that the appellant “did then and there unlawfully transport spirituous, vinous and malt liquors capable of producing intoxication.” The ground of the attack is the failure…