Legal Opinion

State v. Stalls

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Collin. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Andrews. There is no occasion for a statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtOgden, J.

The indictment in this case was attempted to be drawn under Article 2351, Paschal’s Digest, and charges' that the defendant “ did unlawfully and feloniously, without the “ consent of the owner, V. H. Allen, carry away certain tira- “ her.” The indictment is neither in the language of the statute, nor does it use equivalent language; “ unlawfully ” is not equivalent to “ knowingly,” for an act may be knowingly done, and yet not be unlawful, ánd an act may be unlawful, and yet committed in ignorance. This may have been the facts in regard to the act for which the defendant in this case was…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. SternWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Ham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. State v. StrawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Tynes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API