Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Kilgore
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided November 13, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00501Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE VERNON H. DAHL, III PLAINTIFF vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00501-CRS JERMAINE KILGORE, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Nicholas Lietz (“Lietz”), Cher Fillmore (“Fillmore”), and Jermaine Kilgore (“Kilgore”). DN 43, 44, 46. Plaintiff, Vernon Dahl III (“Dahl”), responded to the motions filed by Kilgore and Fillmore. DN 47, 48. Only Kilgore filed a reply. DN 49. The matter is now ripe for review. For the reasons stated herein, the Court…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.