State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellant was placed on probation for two years for contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a misdemeanor. 1 He contends that a probationary period of two years is excessive. We find no merit and affirm.
Appellant’s complaint is that although the maximum jail sentence he could possibly be required to serve is one year, the court placed him on probation for two years. Probation, however, is a matter of legislative grace, State v. Smith, 112 Ariz. 416, 542 P.2d 1115 (1975), and the court’s authority is derived from the statutes. State v. Carter, 116 Ariz. 595, 570 P.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Pickett v. BoykinArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. CutlerArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spitz v. Municipal Court of City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Demarce v. WillrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State v. CarranzaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988