Legal Opinion

(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 30, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00688Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIAN SOLORIO, 1:19-cv-00688-NONE-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS OTTSMAN AND CHAVEZ ON PLAINTIFF’S 14 SULLIVAN, et al., MEDICAL CLAIMS UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AND AGAINST 15 Defendants. DEFENDANTS OTTSMAN, CHAVEZ, CLAYTON, GRATOKOSKI, AND CARDENAS 16 FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT; AND THAT 17 ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A 18 CLAIM UNDER § 1983 (ECF No. 21.) 19…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API