Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clifford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9760PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Hamilton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Morris, C.

The appellee sued the appellants to recover-the amount of a ditch assessment.

The appellants demurred to the complaint, on the ground that it did not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled, and they excepted. The-error assigned is the overruling of the demurrer.

One of the objections urged to the complaint is that it does-not contain a copy of the assessment upon which the action is founded. The appellee insists that the complaint does contain a copy of the assessment.

The assessment is the foundation of the action, and is a; written…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Dutch v. BoydIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sinker, Davis & Co. v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Rogers v. State ex rel. CoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Davisson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Shaw v. State ex rel. WhitmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Smith v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Mayfield v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Jackson v. State ex rel. LindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API