Marie W. F. Nugent-Head Trust v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Rice, Judge:
The sole question is whether partial redemptions of petitioners’ stock by the Corporation in 1945 and 1947 were made at such time and in such manner as to be essentially equivalent to taxable dividends to this petitioner trust and, therefore, governed by section 115 (g) of the Internal Revenue Code rather than by section 115 (c) ,1 This is a question of fact to be determined from all of the facts and circumstances making up the record. William H. Grimditch, 37 B. T. A. 402 (1938).
It is difficult for us to see how money received by petitioners for the partial redemption of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boyle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Estate Of Irwin G. Lukens, Deceased. George E. Lukens, PetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Penfield v. DavisDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
- Lukens v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Auto Finance Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.