Lukens v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by a taxpayer from a decision of the Tax Court, Irwin G. Lukens, 1956, 26 T.C. 900, challenges that court’s conclusion that an amount paid by a corporation to a stockholder for the redemption of certain stock was essentially equivalent to and, under Section 115(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 53 Stat. 48,1 should be treated as a distribution of a taxable dividend to the stockholder.
The present problem has arisen in this way. A corporation, Florex Gardens, was organized in 1907 to engage in the business of growing and marketing flowers. Its entire…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Flanagan v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Boyle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Zenz v. QuinlivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Elizabeth N. B. Ferro v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beatrice Levin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- In Re Estate Of Irwin G. Lukens, Deceased. George E. Lukens, PetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957