Legal Opinion

Lukens v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 11, 1957No. 12094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal by a taxpayer from a decision of the Tax Court, Irwin G. Lukens, 1956, 26 T.C. 900, challenges that court’s conclusion that an amount paid by a corporation to a stockholder for the redemption of certain stock was essentially equivalent to and, under Section 115(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 53 Stat. 48,1 should be treated as a distribution of a taxable dividend to the stockholder.

The present problem has arisen in this way. A corporation, Florex Gardens, was organized in 1907 to engage in the business of growing and marketing flowers. Its entire…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BedfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Flanagan v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Boyle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Zenz v. QuinlivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  5. Elizabeth N. B. Ferro v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beatrice Levin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. In Re Estate Of Irwin G. Lukens, Deceased. George E. Lukens, PetitionersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API