Legal Opinion

Banik v. Bishop-Stoddard Cafeteria Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 18, 1937No. Gen. No. 9,127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dove

This is an action brought by W. E. Banik against Bishop-Stoddard Cafeteria Co., Inc., an Iowa corporation, and Cyril Kegler, its president, to recover damages for an* alleged breach of contract. The declaration consisted of the common counts, to which the defendants filed the general issue and two special pleas. One special plea alleged that the several supposed promises set forth in the declaration were not evidenced by any writing signed by the defendants and therefore were within the statute of frauds; the second special plea averred that the supposed promises set forth in the declaration…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clause v. Bullock Printing Press Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brand v. HendersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Morris v. JamiesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Seckel v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Ullmann v. KentIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George F. Mueller & Sons, Inc. v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Hemingway v. Skinner Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. DeLeuw, Cather & Co. v. City of JolietAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
  4. Izzo v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Oppenheimer Bros., Inc. v. Joyce & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API