Legal Opinion

Sicklick v. Schasseur

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

These are appeals by defendant Schasseur from two orders at Special Term, the first denying a motion to vacate the warrant of attachment upon the original papers, and the second order denying a motion to vacate the warrant of attachment upon affidavits submitted by the defendant.

Judged by the well-established rule that in order to sustain an attachment facts as distinguished from mere conclusions must be shown, we find that the plaintiff has failed to show that he suffered substantial damage. Attachment is a summary remedy, property being impounded before judgment and the courts have often…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prentiss v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Delafield v. J. K. Armsby Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Dudley v. Armenia Insurance of PittsburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. GabelWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Valentine Dolls, Inc. v. McMillanNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Buono v. W. J. I. Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Day v. DwormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API