Mellen v. Hirsch
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in a personal injury action, in which the lower court held that an exclusive remedy was provided by the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., applicable in the District of Columbia as a Workmen’s Compensation Act, D.C.Code 1940 secs. 36 — 501, 36 — 502, 45 Stat. 600, c. 612, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 note. Appellant, in a prior action in the District of Columbia, had contended that the act did not apply to him because he was employed in violation of the child labor law, but this contention was decided against…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mellen v. H. B. Hirsch & SonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jose Estevez v. Horace A. Nabers, Acting Officer in Charge, New Orleans Office Immigration& Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Garrett Park v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- United States ex rel. ACME Limestone Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1975