Legal Opinion

Mellen v. H. B. Hirsch & Sons

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 3, 1947No. 9376PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

Appellant, a boy fifteen years old, brought this action at common law to recover damages for an accidental personal injury that arose out of and in the course of his employment by appellees. The District Court dismissed the complaint because the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 44 Stat. 1424, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq., applicable in the District of Columbia as a Workmen’s Compensation Act, D.C. Code 1940 §§ 36—501, 36—502, 45 Stat. 600, c. 612, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 note, provides that in respect to such an injury compensation under the Act shall be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noreen v. William Vogel & Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc. v. BeukersAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Provo v. Bunker Hill CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1975
  4. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. MATTER OF LOCKARD v. St. Maries Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API