Legal Opinion

Hatt v. McCurdy

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1937No. 43870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSager, J.

Appellee, who is the assignee of a claim for contribution on account of certain payments made on a note by the appellants McCurdy, brought action to recover the sum of $1,850. The claim of contribution arises from the fact, as is alleged, that comakers of a certain note with the McCurdy’s paid thereon $8,000, and that the proportion of the payment which should have been made by appellants was the amount sued for herein. The original obligation and the mortgage securing the same were attached .as exhibits to the appellee’s petition, and, on proper allegation, an attachment issued. A special…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barto v. Sioux City Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. Reilley v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Farmers Exchange Bank v. TresterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Hueston v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Jean v. HennessySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. EitzenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Wharff v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Newell v. TweedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  4. Lunt v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Matter of Estate of BearbowerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API