Legal Opinion

Matter of Estate of Bearbower

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided September 24, 1985No. 85-260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OXBERGER, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s refusal to reinstate their petition which was dismissed for failure to prosecute the action pursuant to Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 215.1. We reverse the trial court.

The petition brought by plaintiffs, the heirs of the decedent, contains three counts attacking decedent’s will. The defendants are the individuals receiving the bulk of the inheritance under the will and codicil. Three counts are alleged in the petition which was filed May 27, 1983. Count one claims that the witnesses to the will were not competent. Count two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rath v. SholtySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Dealers Warehouse Co. v. Wahl & AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Reilley v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Wharff v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Newell v. TweedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. MullapudiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  2. Holland Bros. Construction Co. v. Iowa Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
  3. Francisco Villa Magana v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. Francisco Villa Magana, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API