State v. Beck
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The issue is the failure of the trial court to conduct an in camera hearing pursuant to Evidence Rule 510(c)(2). We discuss: (1) the pretrial motion; (2) the trial evidence; and (3) the post-trial motion.
Pretrial Motion
Three indictments charged defendant with five offenses in connection with controlled substances. Prior to trial, defendant moved, in each case, for an order requiring the State to disclose the identity of the informant. The motion alleged that an informant was instrumental in arranging the alleged narcotics sales, and was a participant in the sales and, apart…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. PrueittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. David Wayne FreundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Felipe Gonzales and Vincente Rodriguez OvalleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BauskeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BoltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. HenselNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.