Legal Opinion

Staargaard v. Public Service Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 1, 1949No. 3853Published

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.

The position of the plaintiffs is stated in their brief as follows: “Moreover, the plaintiff is not here asking for discovery process and does not seek to examine the records, hence neither discovery nor pretrial examination would serve the purpose involved. The production is now sought as a testimonial aid, rather than for the purposes of examination.”

It is true that the propriety of questions asked in the taking of a deposition under R. L., c. 393, s. 1 does not depend upon the certainty of their admissibility at the trial but rather upon the fact of whether the matters inquired about may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  2. Lefebvre v. Somersworth Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  3. Boston & Maine Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1910
  4. Watkins v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
  5. Swinglehurst v. BusielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API