Legal Opinion

Kushner v. Mascho

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1977No. 54284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

The appellant Kushner, having obtained a money judgment against Mascho, attempted post-judgment discovery under CPA § 69 (Code Ann. § 81A-169) and Code § 38-801. The appellee’s only response to substantive questions upon deposition and to a subpoena for the production of documents was that the answers, and the documents, would tend to work a forfeiture of his estate. The appellant moved for an order compelling discovery, which was denied. Finding the interposed objection to discovery — forfeiture of estate — to be invalid, we reverse the judgment.

Code § 38-1205, which defines as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Busby v. Citizens Bank of HapevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Aldridge v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Townsend v. NorthcuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. Fleming v. BuseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Kushner v. MaschoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API