Kushner v. Mascho
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Judge.
The appellant Kushner, having obtained a money judgment against Mascho, attempted post-judgment discovery under CPA § 69 (Code Ann. § 81A-169) and Code § 38-801. The appellee’s only response to substantive questions upon deposition and to a subpoena for the production of documents was that the answers, and the documents, would tend to work a forfeiture of his estate. The appellant moved for an order compelling discovery, which was denied. Finding the interposed objection to discovery — forfeiture of estate — to be invalid, we reverse the judgment.
Code § 38-1205, which defines as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Plunkett v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Busby v. Citizens Bank of HapevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Aldridge v. Mercantile National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Townsend v. NorthcuttCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Fleming v. BuseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Kushner v. MaschoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Mitzner v. HymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985