Bock v. Bock

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in calculations leading to the denial of her motion for an upward modification of the trial court’s 1979 child support award. The ease requires our review of law on the vexing child support topic of allowances for later born children.

FACTS

The marriage of the parties was dissolved in March 1979. Custody of a son, now 16, was placed with appellant Renae Bock, now Renae Jeno. The judgment determined an obligation of respondent Bruce Bock to pay child support of $175 per month.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s…