Legal Opinion
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 1987No. C7-87-1296, C9-87-1297PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
In separate appeals to this court, relator Northwestern Bell has requested review of two orders by the Public Utilities Commission which vacated and modified a prior 1984 rate order. We consolidated the two appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
This case has a complex and lengthy procedural history. On September 29, 1983, Northwestern Bell filed a petition with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (“Commission”), seeking a $109 million annual rate increase. Between January and April 1984, hearings on the petition were conducted by an administrative…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Hibbing Taconite Co. v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990
- Appeal of Verizon New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In re Authority to Provide Alternative Operator Services in MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.