Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glenn v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1970No. 19034Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

Being of the view that the judgment below reached the correct result and should, therefore, be affirmed, I most respectfully dissent. The several motions in the cause did not reach, eo nomine, the real issue between the parties. That issue is, simply stated, whether, under the circumstances, the defendant by its procedure and motions may be allowed to force the plaintiff in this action into position where a new action will have to be commenced, to which the defendant may assert the defense of the six-year statute of limitations. The actual issue was recognized and decided by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graves v. WelbornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Jennings v. McCowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  3. Pearson v. AnthonySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Martin v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API