Legal Opinion

Higbie v. Comstock

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Decided September 15, 1845PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Beardsley, J.

The defendant moves for the allowance of a writ, in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis, to revoke a judgment rendered against him by this court, for error in fact, to wit, that he, being an infant, appeared and defended by attorney and not by guardian. Such a writ does not issue of course but upon sufficient cause shewn. In Ferris v. Douglass, (20 Wend. 627,) Bronson, J. said, “ the writ can only be issued on motion to this court, and cause shown by affidavit. It must appear with reasonable certainty that there has been some error in fact before the writ will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camp & Ball v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Smith v. KingsleyNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Milam County v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Gibson v. PollockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  5. People Ex Rel. Harrison v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API