Legal Opinion

Pennywell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 2003No. 1182-02PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of burglary of a habitation with the intent to commit theft. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1). After finding the two enhancement allegations to be true, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for thirty-five years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction after finding that Appellant had no standing to contest the search of a stolen bag and that Appellant’s thirty-five-year punishment was permissible as he stipulated to the two enhancement paragraphs. Pennywell v. State, 84 S.W.3d 841 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2002). Appellant has…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pennywell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pennywell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  3. Stokvis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  4. Angelia G. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  5. Angelia G. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API