Legal Opinion

Stokvis v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 19, 2004No. 07-04-0031-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIAN QUINN, Justice.

Appellant, Elaine Stokvis, appeals her conviction for possessing a controlled substance. The sole issue before us concerns whether the trial court erred in failing to grant her motion to suppress evidence. The evidence in question was methamphetamine found in her purse (which resulted in her arrest) and drug paraphernalia found in her luggage after her arrest. The initial search was conducted by two Department of Public Safety officers pursuant to consent given by the male driving the pickup truck in which appellant rode as a passenger. We sustain the issue and reverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Boyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. State v. KlimaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gino Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
  2. Myranda Shay Manley v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2023
  3. Payton Tyler Ross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019
  4. Schenk, Stephanie AnnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Schenk, Stephanie AnnTexas Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API