Legal Opinion

Howard v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1989No. 8821SC1317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the defendants. We disagree and affirm the court below.

I

Initially, we recognize this is an interlocutory appeal under both G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27. “Both G.S. 1-277 and G.S. 7A-27(d) provide for immediate appeal of a judicial order or determination that affects a substantial right.” Green v. Duke Power Co., 305 N.C. 603, 606, 290 S.E.2d 593, 595 (1982). “Since the order of the trial court dismissing plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages did affect a ‘substantial right’ of the plaintiff . . .” this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berrier v. ThriftCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. O'Carroll v. Roberts Industrial Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. McNeill v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Ngo v. SlaughterDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API