Legal Opinion

Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1920No. 10340Published

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. January 4, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

1. In a suit against a railroad company, a plea which admits that the plaintiff was .injured by the running of the cars? but denies negligence and asserts ordinary diligence upon its part, and alleges that the negligence of the plaintiff caused the injury, is not such a plea of justification as will entitle the defendant to the opening and conclusion in the case. See Georgia Railroad v. Williams, 74. Ga. 723 (2); Brunswick &c. R. Co. v. Wiggins, 113 Ga. 842-8 (39 S. E. 551, 61 L. R. A. 513). It was not error in this ease to deny to the defendant the right to open and conclude the argument.

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Brunswick & Western Railroad v. WigginsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  4. Jinks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Atlanta Rapid Transit Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API