Legal Opinion

Holland v. Arch Coal, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-0300Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL H. HOLLAND, as Trustee of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-cv-300 (DLF) v. ARCH COAL, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan (1992 Plan) bring this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 1001

et seq., to compel defendant Arch Coal, Inc. to post security pursuant to the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 (Coal Act), as amended,

26…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API