Legal Opinion

Contee v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 9, 1960No. [No. 91, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorney, J.

The defendant (Gordon Leon Contee), a Negro, was indicted, tried and convicted by a jury of raping a white woman, and from the judgment and sentence entered on the verdict of guilty, he has appealed to this Court.

Since the defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence, a detailed 'statement of the facts and the attendant circumstances would serve no useful purpose. It will suffice to say that there was ample testimony, if believed, to convict the defendant despite his défense that the prosecuting witness had consented to the sexual intercourse which ensued after he had forcibly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Glaros v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Giles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Bowie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API