Legal Opinion

Hood v. Holligan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 558PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The original bill was filed by the appellant, Bruce A. Hood, under the statute to quiet the title to the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of section 10, township 16, range 3 west, Jefferson county, not including the mineral rights.

The bill avers that the complainant is in the peaceable possession of the property; that the appellees, Narcissus Holligan (also known as Holihan), a non compos mentis, J. E. Brewer, as guardian of said non compos mentis, and Earnest Ragland, are claiming some right, title, or interest in said land, and calls on them to set forth and avow…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Livingston v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Hale v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Thomas v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Beaty v. WashamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. LeigeberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Stallworth v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Ivey v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Ward v. StallworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API