Legal Opinion
Hale v. Hale
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 1, 1917No. 7 Div. 853PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from Chancery Court, Cherokee County; W. W. Whiteside, Chancellor. Suit by W. J. Hale, pro ami, against A. L Hale and others. Erom a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, j.
The bill in this cause seeks the cancellation of several conveyances, on the ground of the insanity of the grantor at the time the conveyances were executed. The bill was amended several times. As last amended (the form of the bill on which the trial was had) it does not purport to be aided by any former biil or amendment. A material averment of fact, as to the execution •of the conveyances cancellation of which is sought, is:
“That on said day [January 20th, 1915] the said W. J. Hale executed a warranty deed to the above-described lands to A. L. Hale, a copy of which deed is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Mitchell v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Thomas v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Bates v. OdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Zaner v. ThrowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Davidson v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- McClelland v. CostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.