Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Frauenthal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1940No. 4-5975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGrieein Smith, C. J.

The decree questioned by this appeal modified a master’s report relating to controversies between S. R. Thomas and the law firm of Frauenthal and Johnson.

Prior to November, 1927, Thomas was a successful business man and for many years had been represented by the firm whose fees are alleged to have been excessive. Having prospered financially as distributor of Dodge automobiles, Thomas extended his business operations and became financially involved to such an extent that creditors grew apprehensive; and when habitual intoxication impaired his usefulness, he acquiesced in an arrangement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grable v. BlackwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Otis & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Carter v. Bartholomew Road Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. FrauenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API