Legal Opinion

Saunders v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 18, 1990No. 04-89-00235-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Justice.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit arson. TEXAS PENAL CODE ANN. § 15.02. The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ confinement.

We shall first address appellant’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. The state’s theory presented to the jury was that appellant had his house burned down in order to collect insurance proceeds. James Woodley, an old friend of appellant’s, testified that appellant approached him with a request to burn the house while appellant would be out of the state. Woodley refused. Shortly…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Oakley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Criner v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1992
  4. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Carl Leonard Skiff v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API