Legal Opinion

Blume v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-12251Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THOMAS BLUME and JASON MARTINEZ Plaintiffs, -against- No. 18-cv-12251 (CM) PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION Defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT McMahon, C.J.: Plaintiffs Thomas Blume and Jason Martinez brought this case under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act,

45 U.S.C. § 51

e7 seq., seeking to recover for injuries they sustained while working for the Defendant, Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation (“PATH”), a commuter rail service operating in the New York City metropolitan area. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
Lorenzo CHAMBERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRM COPY CENTERS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.