Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Shesky
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided August 19, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00492Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LAWRENCE HOUSTON HOBBS, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-492-pp v. RUSTEN SHESKY, DANIEL G. MISKINIS, JOHN/JANE DOES, ERIC LARSEN, CITY OF KENOSHA, and KENOSHA POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER (DKT. NO. 6) On May 26, 2022, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to file electronically and to use certain electronic devices in the courtroom. Dkt. No. 5. The court found that the plaintiff had not presented extraordinary circumstances requiring permission to e-file and that this district has…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Caisse Nationale De Credit Agricole, a French Banking Corporation v. Cbi Industries, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.