Legal Opinion

Vande Vooren v. McCall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1960No. Docket No. 13, Calendar No. 47,978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiff’s bill sought a decree confirming in him the sole vendee’s interest, under 4 land contracts, in 4 pieces of real estate, free from any interests of defendant, and enjoining defendant from interfering with plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment thereof. Defendant’s cross bill prayed for decree confirming title thereto in her and terminating any interests therein- of plaintiff, restraining plaintiff from collecting any rents from the property or interfering with her management thereof and requiring him to account to her for rents collected therefrom. From decree.for plaintiff as prayed,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hull v. HostettlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cutler v. LovingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Jankowski v. JankowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCluskey v. WiniskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Fricke v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API