Legal Opinion

State v. Caruso

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1926No. 19624. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by the prosecuting attorney of Pierce county, on behalf of the state, to recover upon a bail bond of $1,000, filed in the justice court of Tacoma, Pierce county, before E. J. Hackett, justice of the peace, on behalf of Caruso as principal, and Olivieri and Clemente as sureties. No service was made upon Clemente or upon Caruso, the principal. Service was made upon Olivieri.

The complaint of the state, in substance, alleges that on September 1, 1922, Caruso was tried by the justice of the peace above named, found guilty of selling two drinks of intoxicating liquor, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Schenck.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RansomCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. State v. AkersWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. StrickerWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API