Legal Opinion

In re Bedford Watch Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

It appears that the courts of the Confederation of Switzerland will not execute the usual commission to examine witnesses, but will recognize and execute letters rogatory. The ends of justice will therefore be better promoted by the issuance of letters rogatory. Section 309, New York Civil Practice Act. Claimants’ motion for issuance of letters rogatory is therefore granted. DeVilleneuve v. Morning Journal Ass’n (D.C.) 206 F. 70; Spellman v. Sullivan (C.C.A.) 61 F.(2d) 787.

The order to be submitted will name the witnesses to be examined. Claimants’ attorney's make…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Villeneuve v. Morning Journal Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1913
  2. Spellman v. SullivianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oscar Gruss & Son v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. U. S. Neckwear Corp. v. Sinaco Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. In re the Estate of KadarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API