Legal Opinion
Giddings v. Tartler
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 1989No. 1937 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
Daniel Giddings moves for judgment on the pleadings in our original jurisdiction 1 on his petition for review in the nature of mandamus against Herman Tartler, 2 Secretary of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, and Thomas Fulcomer, 3 Superintendent of the State Correctional Institute at Huntingdon (respondents). Respondents move for summary judgment in this matter.
Giddings’ pro se petition for review, filed August 3, 1988, seeks a parole interview from the board. Giddings is presently serving two concurrent four-and-one-half-to-ten-year sentences in the SCI at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gillespie v. DEPT. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Beardell v. Western Wayne School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Weyand v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Yakowicz v. CostiganCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Gillespie v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Meier v. MaleskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Casner v. American Federation of State, County & Municipal EmployeesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Hammerstein v. LindsaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.