Legal Opinion
Frankel v. Slotkin
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 18, 1989No. 85-CV-3385PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
COSTANTINO, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this derivative action on behalf of United Brands Company (“UB”). The defendants have moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to Rules 9(b), 12(b)(6), and 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Alternatively, the defendants request that the plaintiff be required to post a bond pursuant to New York Business Corporation Law § 627. Plaintiff cross-moves, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(a) for partial summary judgment on his claim under § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Facts
Plaintiff,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Sec v. MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Frankel v. SlotkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Frankel v. SlotkinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997