Legal Opinion

Mahboob v. Educational Credit Management Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 25, 2021No. 3:15-cv-00628Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BEHESHTA MAHBOOB, on behalf of Case No.: 15-CV-628 TWR (AGS) herself and all others similarly situated, 10 Plaintiff, 11 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. 12 EDUCATIONAL CREDIT 13 MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Presently before the Court is Defendant’s argument that this action should be 17 dismissed pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Mandate (ECF No. 148) and the principle discussed 18 in Lierboe v. State Farm,

350 F.3d 1018, 1023

(9th Cir. 2003). For the reasons discussed 19 below, the Court DISMISSES this action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Kristine E. Lierboe, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Northstar Financial Advisors Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Janice Foster, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Center Township of Laporte CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API