Schadendorf v. Snap-On Tools Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Justice.
In this appeal, a claimant and her employer challenge the workers’ compensation commissioner’s award of penalty benefits under Iowa Code section 86.13 (1999). The district court affirmed the award of penalty benefits; however, it remanded the case to the agency to determine wheth er further penalty benefits were due. Because we find the workers’ compensation commissioner was correct in awarding penalty benefits to the claimant and the claimant is not entitled to further benefits, we reverse the judgment of the district court remanding the case for further proceedings before…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auen v. Alcoholic Beverages Division of Iowa Department of CommerceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Mycogen Seeds v. SandsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- State v. DohlmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- ABC Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. EfflerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Deanna Jo Ramirez-Trujillo v. Quality Egg, L.L.C., Wright County Egg Division, and Selective Insurance Company of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Toby Thornton v. American Interstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Bell Bros. Heating & Air Conditioning v. GwinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.