Legal Opinion
Magbee v. Federal Express
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2012No. 12-77PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
[tThe plaintiff, Paul Magbee, appeals certain issues arising from a workers’ compensation judgment which awarded him indemnity benefits and awarded or denied various medical treatments, tests, penalties and attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment in part as amended, reverse it in part, and render judgment on issues arising from the reversal.
DISCUSSION OF THE RECORD
Mr. Magbee, a fifteen-year employee of Federal Express Corporation (FedEx), suffered a work-related injury on December 9, 2009, while attempting to open the hood of his delivery truck. At the time of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Freeman v. Poulan/Weed EaterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Romero v. Garan's, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Daniel v. Point to Point Directional Drilling, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Fabacher v. Stine, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lafayette Steel Erector, Inc. v. ConstanceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Conner v. Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.