Kirkland v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
Exception is taken to the action of the court in permitting Dr. Blackmore, who qualified as' an expert, to testify that the blow which cracked the skull of the party assaulted might have affected that party’s sight as it was developed the day after the lick was struck. This related to the res gestae and was therefore relevant. The matter inquired about being the subject of the result of cause and effect as the same related to scientific investigation was properly proven by the opinion of the expert who had duly qualified. The cases of Humber v. State, 99 So. 71, 19 Ala. App. 451, and McKee v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McKee v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Humber v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Bean v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
- Mann v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Kelley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- Flint v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.