Legal Opinion
United States v. Rodney L. McNeal
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 23, 1996No. 94-2804PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Rodney McNeal of traveling in interstate commerce to facilitate the crime of extortion in violation of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952, and of doing so while using a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). McNeal appeals, alleging that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, (2) the jury was improperly instructed as to the elements of a Travel Act violation, (3) evidence of guilty pleas from McNeal’s codefendants was erroneously admitted, and (4) evidence was admitted in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. We affirm.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Kenyatta Brack, Patrick Henderson, Willie Tyler, Nicholas Martinez, Maurita Stovall, and Dana RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard O'HaraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Anthony C. Zizzo, James J. Marcello, Richard Gervasio, Anthony N. Chiaramonti, Brett K. O'dell, and Samuel A. CarlisiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Danny Owens (95-6357), Blake Owens (95-6405), Ira John Woodfin (95-6631), and Kaye Miller Bennett (95-6632)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David E. MartinelliCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.