Porras v. Campbell Sales Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly applied the “accepted work doctrine” to this case when it granted the appellee’s motion for a directed verdict. We hold that the trial court misconstrued the accepted work doctrine and that the motion for directed verdict was improperly granted.
When reviewing a directed verdict:
[W]e must consider the evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom in a light most favorable to the opposing party, Tanner v. Levie, 105 Ariz. 149, 460 P.2d 995 (1969). Moreover, the court cannot weigh the evidence when passing upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shannon v. Butler Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Tucson v. GallagherArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Davis v. WeberArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Kennecott Copper Corporation v. McDowellArizona Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kristek v. CatronCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- Sarmiento v. Stubblefield's Custom Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994