Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentHays, Circuit Judge
I
It is unlikely that, except for the district judge, who in the course of his careful opinion never once mentioned COGSA, anyone will be more astonished at the majority opinion in this case than the appellant who in a forty-nine page brief addressed two pages to. an almost 'pro forma argument on COGSA.
I suppose that nobody would deny that a carrier and a shipper can agree that cargo is to be stowed on deck. Not only has some cargo always been carried in this way, see Davidson v. Flood Bros., 30 F.2d 279 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 279 U.S. 853, 49 S.Ct. 348, 73 L.Ed. 996 (1929); The Peter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Standard Electrica, S.A. v. Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft, Defendant-Appellee,and Columbus Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- American Tobacco Co. v. the Katingo HadjipateraDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Dietrich v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. American Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.