Conkling v. Pacific Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from an order granting an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This action was brought by the respondent against the appellant to enjoin the latter from diverting water from a certain natural stream in the county of Santa Barbara. The defendant owned two tracts of land on the stream. Between'these two tracts the plaintiff was in possession of a tract of land, claiming the same as a pre-emptor from the government, and for which he held a receiver’s receipt.
The court below found for the plaintiff, and enjoined the defendant from diverting and using the water, as prayed for in the complaint. No motion for a new trial was made, but the bill of exceptions was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. Clear Lake Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Page v. HobbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Quinn v. KenyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Figg v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Vestal v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.