Legal Opinion
Tracy v. Danzinger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 11, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court made on defendant’s application, granting summary judgment dismissing their complaint, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act.
The material allegations of the complaint are that plaintiffs are the sole distributees of Willard D. Ackley, deceased; that Sarah E. Ackley was the wife of Willard D. Ackley; that the husband and *47wife entered into a contract wherein and whereby, for a valuable consideration, they made mutual wills whereby each willed to the other all his or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of LyonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Felberose Holding Corp. v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lederer v. Wise Shoe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In re Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Tracy v. DanzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938